How Much Evidence
Do You Need?
Give Them
Something To Eat!
Mark 6:33-44
‘If Jesus wants us to believe in
Him, why didn’t He provide us with irrefutable proof that He is God?’—This is
the cry of the skeptic. This is the question often posed by those who have not
yet placed their faith in the Son of God.
In response to that question, I
concede that we do not possess ‘irrefutable proof’ that Jesus is the Son of
God. So, in the absence of ‘irrefutable proof’, we should ask about the body of
evidence available to us. What evidence is there to support the claim that
Jesus is the Son of God?
Beloved, as I consider the body of
evidence that supports the claims of Jesus Christ, I conclude that this body of
evidence is gargantuan, and it is convincing. We get a sample of that evidence
in the text before us this evening.
I should also say something about
the demands for ‘irrefutable proof’ and ‘evidence’. In my mind, to demand the
former is not always helpful, while to demand the latter is eminently
necessary. Let me illustrate this by taking you back in time. In June of 1993,
I took a step of faith and asked Allie Pomeroy to marry me, and in May of 1994,
we both took a step of faith in exchanging marriage vows with one another.
The reason I say that getting
married involved ‘steps of faith’ is because I did not possess irrefutable
proof that Allie loved me. I did not require her to take a polygraph test, nor
am I a mind reader. In order for me to determine whether Allie loved me, I had
to interpret the evidence before me. Well, some of the obvious evidence came in
the form of words; other times in came in the form of kind gestures.
Particularly convincing was Allie’s willingness to watch Hockey Night in Canada
with me each Saturday. And perhaps the most convincing bit of evidence was
Allie’s willingness to continue our relationship, even as she uncovered all of
my idiosyncrasies.
My point is that if I waited until I
had ‘irrefutable proof’ that Allie loved me I might not have never made a
marriage proposal. Along a similar vein, those who demand that God produce
‘irrefutable proof’ are likely to find that they have missed out on the most
special relationship available to mankind.
I am thankful for the mountainous
body of evidence given to us in nature, and more specifically, in the
historical record we call the Bible.
In the text before us this evening,
we see the disciples of Jesus struggling to interpret the evidence that points
to Him as the Son of God. Though our text is the feeding of the five thousand,
we would be remiss if we did not note the commissioning of the disciples at the
beginning of chapter 6—specifically, verses 7 through 13.
It is interesting that Jesus would
give such responsibility to His disciples given their manifest lack of
perception. As one commentator has put it, “It is difficult to exaggerate the
risk Jesus took in sending His disciples out to teach and heal” (English, The
Message of Mark, 125). The risk in sending the disciples has to do with
their persistent inability to comprehend Jesus’ teaching (4:10-13). The
disciples had also demonstrated a lack of trust in Jesus’ will, and ability, to
protect them—on a boat, in the midst of a storm, they cried out to Him, “Teacher,
do You not care that we are perishing?” (4:38). Yet, in spite of their lack
of perception, Jesus sends the disciples out in pairs, to teach, heal, and to
exorcize demons (6:7-11).
Amazingly enough, the disciples,
despite all their limitations, find themselves with the ability to cast out
demons and heal diseases (6:13). You would think the disciples would soon
connect the dots and understand that the One who commissioned them has
authority over all creation. You would think that they might then understand
that they are in the presence of the Son of God and that nothing is too
difficult for Him. Yet, from the accounts before us today, we see that the
disciples still didn’t get it.
Admittedly, the disciples were
likely quite tired from all the ministry they had been engaged in. The plan was
for them to be by themselves (6:32), but the crowds continued to follow them.
And when Jesus sees the crowd, we are told, “He felt compassion for them
because they were like sheep without a shepherd; and He began to teach them
many things” (6:34).
Jesus, motivated by compassion,
adjusts His itinerary. But the disciples object, “This place is desolate and
it is already quite late; send the people away so that they may go into the
surrounding countryside and villages and buy themselves something to eat”
(6:35, 36).
From all outward appearances, the
objections of the disciples were quite reasonable. They were out in the middle
of nowhere, with nothing to eat; it was getting late and if there was to be any
hope in purchasing dinner somewhere, the gathering needed to be broken up
immediately. There appeared to be no other alternative; their calculations were
correct except that they forgot to include in their calculations the impact
of the presence of Jesus.
Jesus responds to the disciples
proposal with the order, “You give them something to eat!” (6:37). The
disciples are miffed. By their calculations it would take 200 days worth of
wages to feed a crowd of this size. Their response was, “This is too expensive.
This proposal of Yours exceeds what our budget allows” (6:37).
You can imagine how this scenario would play out in
the average Presbyterian church. First, there would be a feasibility study to
determine whether or not it was even possible to feed this many people. If it
were possible, a committee would be struck to determine the most effective way
to distribute the food. And, of course, before any of this was executed,
Session would need to meet in order to assess the proposal.
But notice how Jesus operates; He
does not survey the opinions of His disciples in search of a motion before
making a decision, He simply issues a command, “You give them something to
eat!” Jesus does not consider what is feasible; He considers only what
is best to do. He considers their spiritual state and feels
compassion for the people, He considers their physical state and
appreciates the fact that they are likely very hungry, and He considers how to
immediately remedy this situation.
Jesus says to His disciples, “How
many loaves do you have? Go and see!” (6:38). They were to rummage through
all of their belongings, and to bring every crust, and every scrap of food to
Jesus . . . “Master, we have five loaves of bread and two fish” (6:38).
Matthew records for us Jesus’
response, “Bring them to Me” (Mt. 14:18).
“But Master, there is barely enough food for
ourselves.”
“Never mind, bring them to Me.”
“But Master, there are more people in need then we are
able to help.”
“Never mind, bring them to Me.”
And what does Jesus do? He looks
heavenward, gives thanks, and distributes food sufficient to feed over five
thousand people. O, and one more thing: there were twelve full baskets of bread
and fish leftover (6:41-43).
The disciples still didn’t get it.
Mark records in verse 52, “they had not gained any insight from the incident
of the loaves, but their heart was hardened.”
How much evidence did they need?
They had seen Jesus cast out demons and heal the sick. They, themselves, had
been conduits of His power as they engaged in the same ministry. They had seen
Jesus still the raging sea; and now, they had witnessed a miraculous feeding of
five thousand people. Really, how much
evidence did they need?
How much evidence do you need?
Beloved, do you understand who Jesus
is, and are you prepared to heed His command?
I see I striking parallel between
what happens in this account, and what is expected of us as the Church of
Christ.
Just as Jesus, in His day, felt
compassion towards those who were “like sheep without a shepherd”
(6:34); we too should feel compassion towards those who do not yet know Jesus
Christ.
But, of course, Jesus did more than
“feel” compassion; He acted upon His compassion. And there is a
sense in which the Church should respond to Jesus’ command as if it were
directed to us, “You give them something to eat!”
If Jesus had compassion on lost
sheep, should not His Body, the Church, have compassion for lost sheep? If
Jesus desired to feed hungry sheep, should that not also be the Church’s
desire?
If you were to ask me to summarize
the task of the Christian Church today, I would say this: The Church should
be doing the very things that Jesus did
when He walked this earth. We are not simply a body of people who belong to
Christ, but more precisely, we are Christ’s Body—we are to act on His
behalf. We are to show compassion for the lost sheep by heeding our Master’s
command to “give them something to eat”.
What are we waiting for before we
act? More evidence? Surely God has sufficiently revealed Himself in Jesus
Christ, recorded for us in the Scriptures. Surely, the One who shed His blood
for our sins is worthy to be followed.
And so we rummage through our
possessions, we look at all of our personal resources, and we confess that our
ability to feed the lost sheep is utterly insufficient. Even as a church, we
have only meager contributions to offer this hungry world of ours. But then,
what does Christ say to this? He says, “bring your meager portions to Me. Bring
all that you have to Me ; bring all
that you are to Me, and I will consecrate you to do My bidding. I will give you
sufficient resources to feed My sheep.”
Beloved, let us not be excessive in
our planning.
We must not limit ourselves to do only what appears
feasible.
But let us commit ourselves to do that which Christ
calls us to do. Bring your meager portions to Christ, and trust Him to
provide you with the ability to effectively feed His sheep.
What more evidence do we need? Feed His sheep.
Amen.